<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    On 10/17/2014 11:29, Rahul Sundaram wrote:<br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAHc5q3chN-rWP3gFQqoLpXyG9b797b7JMQmzr8BVZrO-6tuK6w@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Tom Rivers <span
          dir="ltr"></span> wrote:<br>
        <div>
          <div class="gmail_extra">
            <div class="gmail_quote"><br>
              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
                0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class=""></span>
                I didn't call them stupid - in fact I suggested just the
                opposite. Go back and read what I wrote.<span class=""><br>
                </span></blockquote>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>I did.  You said "My point is that users aren't too
                stupid to understand bandwidth/processor
                considerations".  I am just saying even if one doesn't
                understand these considerations, they aren't stupid.<br>
              </div>
              <br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    If you deconstruct the sentence you quoted above, it boils down to
    the subject "users" and the predicate "aren't".  Therefore I said
    quite specifically that users ARE NOT "too stupid to understand
    bandwidth/processor considerations."  The inverse of that statement
    is the users ARE "smart enough to understand bandwidth/processor
    considerations."
    <br>
    <br>
    More to the point, I went on to bolster the notion that Linux users
    are capable of understanding what's at play by saying this:  "These
    are Linux users after all."  That sentence is meant to infer that
    using Linux requires a decent amount of skill, something that again
    goes against the notion that I have somehow called them stupid.
    <br>
    <br>
    Overall, the entire point of me advocating that users should be
    asked whether they want to endure large amounts of
    bandwidth/processor usage during system updates is predicated on the
    notion that they CAN answer the question intelligently.  It would
    make absolutely no sense to posit querying users if they couldn't
    respond intelligently.
    <br>
    <br>
    Please don't persist in asserting I'm saying people are stupid.  It
    quite simply is not the case.<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    Tom<br>
  </body>
</html>