<div dir="ltr">Incredulous yes, angry no. I came here instead of bugzilla because I thought the issue<div>needed a wider audience - especially since it's made its way into the linux media.</div><div>IMO the decision to exclude F2FS was a mistake. The arguments stated as to why it wasn't included </div><div>don't really stand up to scrutiny. Being under heavy development hasn't stopped other features.... as I mentioned earlier</div><div>BTRFS is the poster child for this. Now we're in a situation where products are actually being </div><div>rolled out that ship with F2FS, other major Linux distributions support it, and </div><div>the one linux distribution which prides itself on having the latest and greatest doesn't have it.</div><div><br></div><div>Sorry if my tone was overly aggressive... it's just very disappointing. </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Josh Boyer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jwboyer@fedoraproject.org" target="_blank">jwboyer@fedoraproject.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Gerald B. Cox <<a href="mailto:gbcox@bzb.us">gbcox@bzb.us</a>> wrote:<br>
> Yes, I looked at that bug report and the somewhat terse response. I thought<br>
> I'd post here first before I went the bugzilla route.<br>
><br>
> Based upon the information I discovered tonight it seems a bit puzzling it<br>
> isn't included. Seriously, Ubuntu includes it and we don't?<br>
> Google is using it for the Nexus 9? The "experimental" rationale just<br>
> doesn't hold weight - especially since we are allowing for<br>
> BTRFS Raid5/6; which is made out to be toxic. If it's good enough for<br>
> Google and ahem: "Ubuntu" - it's beyond ridiculous we don't have it.<br>
<br>
</span>So you looked at a bug that is a year and a half old, around the time<br>
when F2FS was very new and under a lot of work, and assumed that<br>
nothing could have possibly changed? Maybe instead of getting angry<br>
and incredulous, you could actually leave a comment in the bug or open<br>
a new RFE bug to have it enabled. If you do, highlighting your<br>
findings without the snarky and aggressive tone would probably help<br>
your case.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
josh<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">--<br>
devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org">devel@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel</a><br>
Fedora Code of Conduct: <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct" target="_blank">http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>