<div dir="ltr">Upstream had a few files that had the old address. I've noticed the GPLv3 doesn't have an address in it's notice. Is it sufficient to instruct upstream<div>to just remove the address for GPLv2. Not that they're going to move again, but seems to be alot of work for everybody if the address is </div><div>actually required.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Michael Catanzaro <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mcatanzaro@gnome.org" target="_blank">mcatanzaro@gnome.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Tue, 2014-12-23 at 11:28 -0800, Gerald B. Cox wrote:<br>
<br>
><br>
> Am I missing something here?<br>
<br>
</span>What package are you building, and what is the output from rpmlint? That<br>
would help. It should point you to a specific file that it has flagged<br>
as containing the outdated postal address.<br>
<br>
(Be aware that this error has to be fixed in the upstream project, not<br>
the Fedora package. As a Fedora packager, you can just ignore the error,<br>
but it's good to report it upstream with a patch.)<br>
<br>--<br>
devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org">devel@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel</a><br>
Fedora Code of Conduct: <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct" target="_blank">http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div>