<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 29 January 2015 at 09:50, Richard W.M. Jones <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rjones@redhat.com" target="_blank">rjones@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 09:03:05PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:<br>
> Clarified the naming guidelines to indicate how language bindings are<br>
> named: lua-randomdb instead of randomdb-lua:<br>
> <a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28General.29" target="_blank">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28General.29</a><br>
<br>
</span>Good to have this clarified. However java packages don't appear to<br>
follow this convention. eg:<br>
<br>
antlr3-java-1:3.5.2-2.fc21.noarch<br>
plplot-java-0:5.10.0-11.fc21.i686<br>
R-java-0:3.1.2-1.fc21.x86_64<br>
tzdata-java-2014j-1.fc21.noarch<br>
<br>
Does this mean we need to rename all Java subpackages?<br clear="all"></blockquote><div><br></div><div>All language binding sub-packages are named this way, no? (subversion-perl, plplot-ada, xen-ocaml, etc)<br><br>But doesn't this guideline refer to naming the base package, not sub-packages? Does it need clarifying further?<br><br></div></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">Mat Booth<br><a href="http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora" target="_blank">http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora</a></div>
</div></div>