<p dir="ltr"><br>
On Feb 17, 2015 7:10 AM, "Peter Robinson" <<a href="mailto:pbrobinson@gmail.com">pbrobinson@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> > Indeed, reproducing the failures only to get a /tmp/ccXXXXXX.out file<br>
> > is not exactly fun.<br>
> ><br>
> > In a related vein, I think ABRT should bundle the /tmp/ccXXXXXX.out<br>
> > files to its reports as well. From time to time we get reports as<br>
> > <<a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189122">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189122</a>>, but such a bug<br>
> > report is largely useless without preprocessed source + command-line<br>
> > options.<br>
> ><br>
> > Sorry if I'm driving this off-topic.<br>
><br>
> Yes, the way to do that is to file a RFE in RHBZ against abrt, they<br>
> are very responsive!</p>
<p dir="ltr">We should not include preprocessed source files by default without the user knowing and agreeing. People use gcc to build proprietary source still.</p>
<p dir="ltr">josh</p>