<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 6 March 2015 at 22:58, Mike Pinkerton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pselists@mindspring.com" target="_blank">pselists@mindspring.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=""><br>
On 6 Mar 2015, at 23:49, Adam Williamson wrote:<br>
<br>
</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 23:09 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:<br>
</span><span class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
I hope <a href="https://xkcd.com/936/will" target="_blank">https://xkcd.com/936/will</a> be among the inputs to that<br>
discussion.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I'm fond of noting that pwquality has not yet blacklisted any variant<br>
of correcthorsebatterystaple. I've been using correcthorse as my stock<br>
anaconda testing password, since the strength check has been<br>
enforced...<br>
</span></blockquote>
<br>
<br>
It won't stand up to a combinator attack:<br>
<br>
<<a href="https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/06/a_really_good_a.html" target="_blank">https://www.schneier.com/<u></u>blog/archives/2013/06/a_<u></u>really_good_a.html</a>><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br></font></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>You are missing the sarcasm that Adam was meaning that such an easy and simple password should be flagged for multiple reasons but isn't. </div></div><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Stephen J Smoogen.<br><br></div></div>
</div></div>