<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">06.03.2015 19:34, Kevin Fenzi пишет:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:20150306093439.06fac64a@voldemort.scrye.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:31:45 -0500
Rich Mattes <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:richmattes@gmail.com"><richmattes@gmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">There's no planned f22 rebuild for gcc5, as f22 defaults to
-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0. These issues are cropping up in f23.
There should probably be a mass rebuild for f23, and sooner rather
than later as rawhide is currently a big game of whack-a-mole when
building c++ packages.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
As soon as gcc folks say things are settled down enough to do one, we
can look at scheduling one. ;)
It would be a shame to do it too soon though and have a bug requiring
another one.
I've been rebuilding things as I run into them being broken.
(The other day it was the gobby stack: net6, libxml++, obby, gobby). </pre>
</blockquote>
Is it ok to rebuild all dependencies f.e. for fix build issue with
pfstools introduced by that update? Or just fill bugzilla issues for
owners?<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:20150306093439.06fac64a@voldemort.scrye.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
kevin
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>