<div dir="ltr">Hi Jens,<div><br></div><div>Any update on the proposed llvm35 package? One of my package (Pure) is affected as it uses the old JIT that is dropped in 3.6, and upstream has only just started rewriting for mcjit.</div><div><br></div><div>If you need a reviewer just ping.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div><br></div><div>-- </div><div>Michel<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:09 PM Jens Petersen <<a href="mailto:petersen@redhat.com">petersen@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
I opened <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221923" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221923</a><br>
about this too but thought it would be good to ask here.<br>
<br>
F22 currently has llvm-3.5.0 (F23 is now on 3.6.0):<br>
I believe there is a newer 3.5.2 bugfix release -<br>
would it make sense to make a F22 update for that?<br>
Is there any expected risk with doing that?<br>
<br>
Anyway for F23 I probably have to make a llvm35 package<br>
again for building ghc-7.10 on armv7 (and ideally aarch64).<br>
3.5.0 has a critical bug that breaks ghc, so it would<br>
be based on 3.5.2 anyway.<br>
<br>
Jens<br>
--<br>
devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org" target="_blank">devel@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel</a><br>
Fedora Code of Conduct: <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct</a></blockquote></div></div></div>