<p dir="ltr"><br>
On Aug 5, 2015 2:55 AM, "Miroslav Lichvar" <<a href="mailto:mlichvar@redhat.com">mlichvar@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:09:34AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:<br>
> > On 4 August 2015 at 04:33, Miroslav Lichvar <<a href="mailto:mlichvar@redhat.com">mlichvar@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> > > As for updating the ncurses package, my current plan is to build the<br>
> > > libs in both ABIs (so there are four builds total with the wide and<br>
> > > narrow versions), use the ncurses-libs subpackage for the new ABI 6<br>
> > > libs and create a new subpackage for ABI 5 libs. What would be a good<br>
> > > name of the subpackage? ncurses-libs5, ncurses5-libs, compat-ncurses5,<br>
> > > or something else?<br>
> > ><br>
> ><br>
> > Are you looking to do this for F23 branch and rawhide or just rawhide<br>
> > and have it land in F24 when it is ready? Or is that still to be<br>
> > determined.<br>
><br>
> I was thinking about doing this in rawhide only with no<br>
> ncurses-specific rebuilds. After the next mass rebuild everything<br>
> that didn't FTBFS should be using the ABI 6 libs.<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Miroslav Lichvar<br>
> --<br>
> devel mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org">devel@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel</a><br>
> Fedora Code of Conduct: <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct">http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct</a></p>
<p dir="ltr">If you can provide both versions, I don't see a reason to not provide it in Fedora 23 branch too. We could just not force a rebuild in the branch and do that only in rawhide.</p>