<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Ralf Corsepius <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rc040203@freenet.de" target="_blank">rc040203@freenet.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span>On 10/09/2015 03:51 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 01:50:27PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
This opens the door to all kinds of duplication, waste of disk space, waste<br>
of RAM, symbol conflicts and unfixed security issues!<br>
</blockquote>
I agree - the new wording does appear to give in to poor programming<br>
practices.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Do you have suggestions for improvements?<br>
<br>
</blockquote></span>
Do I have to pronouce the obivious? FESCO to revert their faulty decision.</blockquote><div> </div></div>After reading these emails the last few weeks, I believe FESCo should be commended. This was just going to turn into</div><div class="gmail_extra">an endless morass - so they stepped in and took the pragmatic approach. That is what leadership is all about. Time to move on. </div></div>