<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:&#39;times new roman&#39;,serif;font-size:small">Ideally, Koschei[0] should be doing this for us, right?</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:&#39;times new roman&#39;,serif;font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:&#39;times new roman&#39;,serif;font-size:small">[0]: <a href="https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei">https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei</a></div><font face="yw-402608bc37fe50adb11a5899295781aeb83d248d-3c8a4964590a3ba5835beb6906fc08eb--o" style="display: none;"></font></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Richard Shaw <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:hobbes1069@gmail.com" target="_blank">hobbes1069@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">I frequently see various incantations that people use to determine what packages need to be rebuilt based on an ABI/API incompatible change to a library.<div><br></div><div>Shouldn&#39;t we have a best practice documented in the wiki for something that&#39;s needed so frequently? And to take it one step further, how about creating a shell script in one of the rpm developer packages?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Richard</div></div>
<br>--<br>
devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org">devel@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel</a><br>
Fedora Code of Conduct: <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there&#39;s only one truth!<br></div></div>
</div>