[Bug 1021342] Aggregation of corrections for F20 Release Notes

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Nov 30 05:11:45 UTC 2013


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021342



--- Comment #26 from Pete Travis <me at petetravis.com> ---
(In reply to TianShixiong from comment #25)
> > I found the problem easily enough from your description, so no worries. The
> > only part you missed was that `git format-patch ...` creates some .patch
> > files in the working directory that you can then share via email or bz.
> 
> I did that, but didn't know it would generate a patch file. Now it's
> attached. :)
> 
> Do I still need 'git push' after 'checkout'?

There's no need to `git push` with this method; whoever accepts the patch can
do that part for you. However, members of the "docs-writers" FAS group (which I
believe you are) can skip the branch-patch sequence, commit directly to the
source repo and `git push` their commit.  Either way is fine, that's up to you.

Whether you commit directly or submit patches, it is a good idea to communicate
with the others working on the guide so the work doesn't overlap, strings can
get repushed to tx, etc.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.


More information about the docs-qa mailing list