davep at dpawson.co.uk
Wed Aug 4 17:54:29 UTC 2004
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 20:27, Karsten Wade wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 10:53, Dave Pawson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 12:46, redwire at therockmere.com wrote:
> > > FC1 and FC2 have been in production since APRIL, it seems important to ME
> > > at least that there be some sort of documentation made avail. Also, I
> > > think that releasing some documentation would help alleviate some of the
> > > errant posting of questions to the fedora-docs mailing list.
> > >
> > > The other alt. is to consider a FC docs based website, on my server, and
> > > ask for any interested doc mailing list participants to send their docs to
> > > me and I'll post them.
> > I was thinking, kind offer etc, until I read Karstens mail, which I
> > believe to be from within Redhat.
> Sorry, can you elaborate? I'm positive I stated my own opinions
> clearly, and not that of Red Hat or anyone else involved in Fedora. I
> don't understand what you mean here.
> > If RH are saying they don't care about documentation, lets put the work
> > in somewhere else? At least until RH realise its important.
> Did someone say this? Where and when specifically, please? I'm happy
> to help apply cluestick.
<quote>Tue, 03 Aug 2004 10:35:19 -0700, your good self
This is just speaking for myself, not Red Hat, but I don't think there
is any specific work being done outside this project (read: this mailing
list) on a process as you describe - taking a document from idea through
What you see in the Documentation Guide, on &FDP-URL;, and on this
mailing list is it, afaik.
To me that implies, as you said, if we don't do it, it won't get done?
More information about the docs