Fedora FAQs in Docs?
kwade at redhat.com
Tue Aug 8 21:32:26 UTC 2006
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 08:46 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> If we want separate PO, a separate module would be preferable. We can
> have fedora-release-notes Requires: fedora-faq if we want to package it
> separately. If we want to just package them together, one PO only is
> probably the name of the game.
We just decided in the FDSCo meeting to do the FAQ as a separate
Doing this, we can release updates, so even if the on-disk version is a
few months out of date, it suggests you immediately update itself. :)
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project
Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20060808/6d29496f/attachment.bin
More information about the docs