Wikipedia license change

[Zach Oglesby]

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote:

> If we make enough noise and a proper cut-off date, we should prevent
> any problems from anyone who has based documents on the OPL-licensed
> content.


This is the only area I see an issue, but lots of publication should keep
that to a very manageable problem. Blog posts and big horns or whatever we
need.

Is the OPL used by very many people anymore anyway? Even the people that
wrote it recomend using a CC license [1]. I am all for the move.

[1]: http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/329
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/docs/attachments/20090527/96ba2417/attachment.html