Commit email
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Mon Mar 8 14:19:30 UTC 2010
Something I had failed to predict about mailing commits to the list is
there's no easy way to tell which commit is destined for which
repository. :-) Perhaps we should settle on another procedure.
So here's what I'd suggest, in cases where you're not authorized to
push your commits to a repository (and don't want to wait for access
to send your patch):
1. If there's a bug in Bugzilla for the problem, attach the commit
there. Note that attaching a patch is not the same as just pasting
it into a comment field. Use the 'Add an attachment' function
instead to keep the bug easy to read. (The 'git format-patch
HEAD^' command will make a nice patch file for you to attach.)
2. Add the 'Patch' keyword to the bug, which indicates a patch is
attached to fix the problem.
3. If there's no bug for the problem, file one and then go to step
1. :-)
What do you guys think?
--
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com
More information about the docs
mailing list