Guide/notes/document sponsorship

Eli elijahm17 at gmail.com
Tue May 18 19:57:26 UTC 2010


On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 13:37 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Ian MacGregor <ardchoille42 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > My vote is for three groups as stated in the quote above and I'm even
> > willing to step up and help with any extra work that entails.
> >
> Agreed.  I don't think it's prudent to give people commit access from
> the moment they send their self-introduction, but new members have a
> lot of hard work to do learning the tools and workflow of the group,
> and they deserve to be "compensated" by receiving the "perks" of
> membership like Ian mentioned.
> 
> 
> BC
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ben Cotton

I agree with the above two. I also don't think there needs to be any
type of time frame to moving up to commit and publishing access either.
So it could be a week, 6 months, or longer, whenever the person is ready
to do the work that is asked of them. If someone is willing to work hard
and learn what needs to be done, then like Ben said, there should be
some sort of compensation for it.

Eli



More information about the docs mailing list