Recent Purge of Content "per Fedora Legal"

[Nick Bebout]

The short version of my answer is that we can not refer in any way to rpmfusion and apparently spot just now realized that the F14 musicians guide and software management guides did and he wanted it gone ASAP.

I will send more info this afternoon when I get off work at $dayjob.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 23, 2014, at 0:01, Christopher Antila <crantila at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> Hi:
> 
> I'm just wondering what's going on with the recent purge of content "per 
> Fedora Legal." Why is this happening now? Who is provoking it? Why are there 
> no entries in the Revision History? What exactly are you trying to remove? 
> (Because I don't think you're getting all of it in the Musicians' Guide).
> 
> I'm in favour of following guidelines from Fedora Legal, but I don't 
> understand why three-year-old documents are being revised without notice, 
> explanation, or obvious record, either for guide owners or the community at 
> large.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Christopher.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJS4LBWAAoJEAWCcTQ3FNFMZpQP+wXC4i7qJ4gJVL82FVuuaz2y
> lBJEpjkxJYy12zPaiIw/pm7/ZbQ+yv+7EKBtozZZmqLho58m5IJst5eSmiyt4wIV
> tvPZrnX6Zu+tYBPcQx+YSzGW0xz81EH/ZXGxQePkD41u/ZD1g7lVmWBUmbgRnPm4
> ssz/IWP5Rs+o20Re7cOEztW/xwLcg7lOEdIJibg1BWFbifvZRiGcQhf5YROfMGNO
> yHijEHYja82LFGmhVLPeKJ4TYo7vbj65JegAfrkEBahzO4ub2FyNyEbgykdNiL8n
> SUSDYHVxGq+m29upie42G2C+mH4fOlREd9oUPdyBQfrgUMr5NfJdwRa4sWIWAc3I
> 0MlE7CltE3ks/prRIvikVUxdabT6pPPaP45TmyTzgzutIdCQaLJqtH+pO40dkdyc
> 8I/6wEb7cOLbpgd7rpXoR3Ruf652C4vHVF0FZP2Dt4VGEH1skvacFau3Q7CeoZz5
> zanG7rwPWHDamnzKcxwrAm/85gdDXUHu9CD2qTSp5mdxT23W6v7Lz3T9n4y6Pj6t
> t6kBgxUhiE+K03TCRBTt3gfZvjtGzMGcrSE7yQLri3UNprB1zqiyLCp6wUPa+lo+
> BeIAXWOAh0wWsq2UhC2zbk1XpYFnsbzUvI7QC7sVR5Ztube80VCeNd1jLweHoL9I
> wnaPvKtskx/BRU4k/1sV
> =zi1G
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>