while persistence is something i understand, i as a nonnativenglishspeaker, don't really understand that overlay persistence. so yes, imho it should be replaced. <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2008/5/19 Rahul Sundaram <<a href="mailto:sundaram@fedoraproject.org">sundaram@fedoraproject.org</a>>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d">Paul W. Frields wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
I'm not sure whether changing this midstream is a great idea. After<br>
all, the "persistence" and "persistent overlay" were terms I described<br>
repeatedly and consistently with every one of the dozen or more<br>
interviews I gave for Fedora 9. <br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
I noticed and it I am still not sure it is the right choice. Many people didn't even get the idea on what was different from previous releases of Fedora or other distributions on this particular USB feature. I am still of the opinion "persistent overlay" is just not the right terminology for end users.<div>
<div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
<br>
Rahul<br>
<br>
-- <br>
fedora-docs-list mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:fedora-docs-list@redhat.com" target="_blank">fedora-docs-list@redhat.com</a><br>
To unsubscribe: <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Linux counter #213090