<div dir="ltr">Just another +1 for time variance. I would love to participate, but my level of coherence to participate at 4 in the morning (US West Coast) would be quite small.<div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div style="font-family:arial;font-size:small">-T</div><div style="font-family:arial;font-size:small">---</div><div style="font-family:arial;font-size:small"><div>Travis Swicegood</div><div>@tswicegood (most everywhere)</div></div></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Nick Coghlan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ncoghlan@gmail.com" target="_blank">ncoghlan@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 18 December 2014 at 05:45, Stephen John Smoogen <<a href="mailto:smooge@gmail.com">smooge@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> On 17 December 2014 at 12:10, Honza Horak <<a href="mailto:hhorak@redhat.com">hhorak@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</span><span class="">>> A good and bad news, as in every story. Good news is that there will be<br>
>> elections in January or so, then I expect a discussion about a meeting time<br>
>> will be opened, so the time will fit new members. A bad thing is that the<br>
>> current time is already quite late for Nick and Jens, so moving it later<br>
>> would mean problems for them on the other hand.<br>
>><br>
><br>
> Ah I didn't realize that. The problems with a 24 hour world. So one of the<br>
> things is that I don't know what is going on with Stacks and Env outside of<br>
> these meeting summaries. I think I keep missing the important threads on the<br>
> list to know where things are going with CentOS or EPEL.<br>
<br>
</span>In this case, it's not just you - the relationship between Fedora,<br>
Fedora Playground, EPEL, COPR, CentOS, and <a href="http://softwarecollections.org" target="_blank">softwarecollections.org</a> is<br>
currently not well-defined, and that was pretty clear from the<br>
discussion in the WG meeting last night. That confusion was the main<br>
trigger for the action to add a project page for SCLs - even if it's<br>
all just questions without answers at the moment, at least we'll have<br>
a shared understanding of what the current questions *are*, and be<br>
able to start looking at who needs to answer them. Even with the<br>
CentOS SIG becoming the official home of <a href="http://softwarecollections.org" target="_blank">softwarecollections.org</a><br>
(assuming I understand that part correctly), Env & Stacks will still<br>
need to be involved in order to figure out how scl.o fits into Fedora,<br>
Fedora Playground, EPEL, and COPR.<br>
<br>
As far as meeting times go, +1 for alternating times between "suitable<br>
for APAC" and "suitable for US West coast". We have a similar problem<br>
with the PSF board meetings (US West coast, central US, Germany,<br>
India, Australia) and it just doesn't work to try to get everyone to<br>
every meeting.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Nick.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
Nick Coghlan | <a href="mailto:ncoghlan@gmail.com">ncoghlan@gmail.com</a> | Brisbane, Australia<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
env-and-stacks mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:env-and-stacks@lists.fedoraproject.org">env-and-stacks@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/env-and-stacks" target="_blank">https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/env-and-stacks</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div></div></div>