EPEL epel7 planning and processes

[Ken Dreyer]

On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 7:23 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth
<tchollingsworth at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:36:48 -0700
>> We might go with epel7. The reason is that some people seem to have
>> confusion about the branches being 'elN'. "Oh, this is rhel6" No, it's
>> epel6, not rhel.
>>
>> Overall pretty minor either way.
>
> Yeah, I have some shell functions and little scripts that would have
> to be adjusted, but they'd need to be adjusted to {6,7} anyway, so
> whatever.

My preference is for "el7", since it's shorter to type :)

- Ken