EPEL Python 3 for 7?

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:57:18PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:48:18AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > Packages for Infrastructure and Clouds, I think). I was thinking about this
> > > more recently in the context of "things we need for Fedora.next in the
> > > coming year or so". The new repo might target both EL and Fedora and provide
> > > alternative versions maintained on, say, a 3-year lifecycle.
> > Yeah -- I think that something like this could be good.  A repo with
> > a 3 year lifecycle may make sense for RHEL more than Fedora as the
> > basesystem we're building on is still active at the end of that period.
> 
> I'm thinking here about SCLs (or possibly other stack/env tech) that might
> target current supported Fedora but have a longer lifecyle of its own (with
> best-effort compatibility for three years).
> 
> I keep coming back to this idea because it's what people ask me for. :)
> 
Ah I see.  I think present thinking around SCLs has revolved around lifetime
for indivudal SCLs but having a repository wide lifetime could be either
better or a useful additional guarantee.

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/epel-devel/attachments/20140117/d2ea51b3/attachment.sig>