EPEL rhel7 final content

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Thu Jun 26 16:07:45 UTC 2014


On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 09:41:32 -0600
Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 25 June 2014 09:28, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 08:23:24 -0700
> > Jeff Sheltren <jeff at tag1consulting.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Awesome, thanks!
> > >
> > > Is there a plan/schedule for getting epel-7 builds into the normal
> > > git/koji/bodhi workflow?  Is that waiting on a CentOS release, or
> > > are there other issues?
> >
> > Well, at least centos release... but additionally:
> >
> > * We should decide what to do with packages in the beta that have
> >   broken deps. I'm thinking we untag them so they don't go out at
> > all and maintainers need to retag them or rebuild them when deps
> > are met and push them via bodhi.
> >
> >
> 
> I figure we would rebuild all of the EPEL beta and consider all
> broken deps and such FTBFS.

I'm not sure there's any need to do a mass rebuild, but I could be
wrong. Anything that has broken deps might need a rebuild, but the
maintainer could just take care of those?

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/epel-devel/attachments/20140626/389bc4c8/attachment.sig>


More information about the epel-devel mailing list