<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 16 June 2014 21:28, Kevin Fenzi <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kevin@scrye.com" target="_blank">kevin@scrye.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="">On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 21:03:57 +0200<br>
Simone Caronni <<a href="mailto:negativo17@gmail.com">negativo17@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> CentOS 7 is being built also for i386 and that would<br>
> mean a lot of semplification into adding packages in EPEL 7. Right<br>
> now the situation is a bit weird as many multilib dependencies cannot<br>
> be satisfied and there are many obstacles in getting i386 binaries to<br>
> run.<br>
<br>
</div>That however, is another kettle of fish. ;)<br>
<br>
So, you are suggesting we move to building against CentOS instead of<br>
RHEL and support 32bit? Where is the CentOS 32bit effort at?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>As far as I know they are coming out with a completely installable i386 tree on release date. A quick look hints that all of the packages are being built for 32 bit as well:<br>
<br></div><div>Kernel example:<br></div><div><br><a href="http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.00.04/kernel/20140612172658/">http://buildlogs.centos.org/c7.00.04/kernel/20140612172658/</a> <br></div></div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">
--Simone<br clear="all"></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr">You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson).<br><br><a href="http://xkcd.com/229/" target="_blank">http://xkcd.com/229/</a><br>
<a href="http://negativo17.org/" target="_blank">http://negativo17.org/</a><br></div>
</div></div>