<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Stephen John Smoogen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:smooge@gmail.com" target="_blank">smooge@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>At last week's EPEL meeting, it was proposed that at least a short term governing committee be put together to help on the following items:</div>
<div><br></div><div>1) EPEL.next (EPIC or EPEL-rolling, etc)</div>
<div>2) Formalizing various amounts of unwritten rules for package addition, removal and maintenance in current repos.</div><div>3) Lower workload on Kevin Fenzi and Dennis Gilmore as they have been EPEL since the last EPSCO was around.</div>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Are EPEL.next and current EPEL going to be steered by the same people? </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br></div><div>At that meeting the following people were nominated to the committee:</div><div><br></div><div>Dennis Gilmore</div><div>Kevin Fenzi</div><div>Stephen Smoogen</div><div>Jim Perrin </div><div><br></div>
<div>
Todays (2014-08-29) meeting this was 'formalized' with people attending the meeting. Added to that was a beginning proposal of committee governance:</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Is the meeting time also formalized? I can make this most of the time, but forgot this morning. (Added to calendar now). </div>
<div> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div>The governance structure will be a short term organization to set up policies and procedues in place for continual maintenance of EPEL. The term of the committee will end 3 months after either new repos are setup or voted not going to happen by said committee. If a longer term running committee is required, the previous board will set up policies for elections and term lengths before the short term committee ends.</div>
<div><br></div><div>After the meeting I realized that wasn't a good deadline so would like to alter it these changes should be completed by the Fedora 22 release date.</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>When is this project release date? On <a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/22/Schedule?rd=Releases/22">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/22/Schedule?rd=Releases/22</a> I see 2015-XX-XX. That's a lot of leeway. </div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>
Working Motto: We put the SCO in Enterprise Linux</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Nice </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr"><span class=""><font color="#888888">
<div><br></div></font></span></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>