<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div>Hi,<br><br><br></div>I made a promise during the campaign to move on with the FOSCo idea. So its time to start working on it.<br><br></div>There is a ticket for it: <a href="https://fedorahosted.org/famsco/ticket/373" target="_blank">https://fedorahosted.org/famsco/ticket/373</a><br><br></div>From my perspective, there is only one point fixed on it, that we all agree to have an FOSCo. It makes not really sense to discuss already FOSCo's structure and how many seats it shall have. Especially with an fixed view, who( or which groups) shall participate in it.<br><br></div><div>There is also another whole, we always saying that most responsebilities are transferred to the regions, that is so but is it also in practice that way?<br><br></div><div>What I think we should do is invite the affected groups to participate in building FOSCo. What was done so far is just a loose questions to Design and Marketing if they would be interested. If I remember right, both said yes.<br><br></div><div>But which groups shall be represented into it, that is the question.<br><br></div><div>Just:<br><br></div><div>* Ambassadors<br></div><div>* Design<br></div><div>* Marketing or also<br><br></div><div>* Documentation<br></div><div>* Translation<br><br></div><div>as stated by Matt as he came up with this idea. From my perspective we have to look first which groups and then invite them to participate. With a clear task to give us an person who will participate for his group in the creation of this comittee.<br><br></div><div>Any opinions?<br><br></div><div>br gnokii<br></div><div><div><div><div><div><br><br clear="all"><div><br>-- <br><div>make me rich, buy my Inkscape book <a href="http://is.gd/yq5OD0" target="_blank">http://is.gd/yq5OD0</a> ;)<br></div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div></div>