cflags

[Farkas Levente]

Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 11:12:51PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
>> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 02:31:46PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>>> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 10:42:56PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
>>>>>> hi,
>>>>>> what was the reason to not add -fstack-protector to mingw's cflags?
>>>>>> i didn't see the reason.
>>>>> It didn't work -- at least in the version of GCC that I tried it with
>>>>> originally.  IIRC compiled OK, but there was a missing symbol when
>>>>> linking.  Maybe it does work now.  I haven't tested it recently.
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW, we are all away until Jan 2nd ~ 5th, so don't expect much to
>>>>> happen before next week.
>>>> what's not compile? gcc or any given package?
>>> It does in fact appear to work now.  Does this mean that our C flags
>>> are identical to the standard Fedora C flags?
>> almost. i'd like to be as little different as possible. so the only
>> difference in this case would be the mms...
>> would you change flags in the filesystem macro?
> 
> I forgot about the bitfields flag.  However it seems we can do this ...
> 
>   %define _mingw32_cflags %{__global_cflags} -mms-bitfields

may be it cab be even better then the current ones.

-- 
  Levente                               "Si vis pacem para bellum!"