[Fedora-spins] Security Spin Technical Review Request

[Jesse Keating]

On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 08:49 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> 
> Would there really be much need for a package that would contain some
> menu entries that would only be used in the spin when its easily just
> put in the kickstart for the WM that is planned to be used for the
> spin?
> 
> I just don't see the benefit of creating and maintaining a separate
> package that is probably only going to be used for this spin since the
> menus will be specific to the packages shipped in the spin anyway.

Stuffing configuration in the ks is really a last ditch effort.  Your
spin should be usable if it were installed as part of a normal install
process, rather than just from a live image.  You should keep as much
configuration as possible in packages rather than the kickstart.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/spins/attachments/20090724/54ce6f4b/attachment.bin