[Fedora-spins] FEL Spin

[Paul W. Frields]

On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 08:59:01PM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 06:38:15PM +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> > Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen
> > > <kanarip at kanarip.com> wrote:
> > >> Hey Chitlesh,
> > >>
> > >> i've not seen your spin in any parts of the process, yet. Could you please
> > >> read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Spins_Process?
> > > 
> > > I had already reserved a timeslot this weekend and the next one as well. :)
> > > 
> > 
> > Hey Chitlesh,
> > 
> > your page still isn't in the right Category or review queue... Get it 
> > updated and reviewed by John Poelstra before the Feature Freeze, and 
> > notify the Spins SIG every step of the way so they can take FEL for a 
> > quick vote, before it's too late.
> > 
> > Summary: The page has to be updated and pass two (!) review queues 
> > before the Feature Freeze tomorrow (!).
> 
> I see that Chitlesh has submitted his Spin for TM approval by the
> Board but it's still in [[Category:Spins_Ready_for_SIG]].  No problem
> per se -- I'm going to assume that the Spins SIG will report their
> approval to me or the FAB list by 1900 UTC tomorrow, in time for our
> meeting.
> 
> I'll make sure this is on the Board agenda for an approval vote at our
> IRC meeting tomorrow afternoon.

Sorry to reply to myself -- but I realized that if there haven't been
major changes to a Spin, it's unclear whether a new TM approval is
needed from the Board.  In the past, once Spins were approved, the
Board typically didn't re-examine them every release.  Obviously if
there have been major changes introduced in a Spin since the prior
approval, the Board should have the chance to revisit the approval.
But in the absence of major changes, does the Spins SIG think this is
necessary every release?

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/spins/attachments/20090303/d2317fd6/attachment.bin