[Fedora-spins] FEL Spin

[Paul W. Frields]

On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:56:46AM +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > I wrote a bit on this in a separate thread (sorry for the scattering
> > -- there were already several going I think).  I think the Spins SIG
> > is fully capable of figuring out what is a major change and what is
> > not.  If any specific problems arise, I think it would be appropriate
> > for the SIG to escalate as it would any other issue.  What do you
> > think?
> > 
> 
> I think we are capable of recognizing major changes, and when there's 
> doubt, there's nothing stopping us from asking the board (through 
> f-a-b?) and getting a little guidance or feedback. This way, we would 
> also not have to redirect the maintainer of a spin between the Spins SIG 
> and the Board, either.

Beautiful -- if you can get that documented in the process page that
would be wonderful.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/spins/attachments/20090305/7614547e/attachment.bin