[Fedora-spins] Proposal: Spins process amendment for Fedora 20 cycle

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 07/10/2013 12:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> In practice, I don't think we can get away with passing off testing of 
> the 'release blocking' desktops to SIGs. 

In reality I have a hard time believing that the board reaches the 
conclusion that continuing to have an default and those two conditioning 
to be the release blocking desktop is the way forward.

The KDE community already is testing their own spin against the criteria 
as do the others except Gnome and I think 19 release cycle should be 
sufficient for the Gnome sub-community to step in and start doing their 
own testing while we in QA return back to our roots and focus on 
covering the installer and the base/core OS and arguably X and cover to 
the best of the ability the platform that all other sub-community are 
building upon.

We already are going to be facing a lot of base/core os moving parts in 
this release cycle within the insanely short release cycle that has been 
decided for us and if we are not going to be "slipping" we need to start 
choosing which part's we will be focusing on.

JBG