[Fedora-spins] Proposal: Spins process amendment for Fedora 20 cycle

[Brendan Jones]

On 07/05/2013 07:03 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
<snip>

I would like to see new spins managed through trac.

I am concerned that forgotten spins create unnecessary work for releng, 
and I think your proposal mitigates this somewhat. There seem to be a 
lot of flash in the pan projects concerning spins (GSOC anyone?) that 
the rest of us end up maintaining.

Your proposal seems sound to me. I think even one sign-off per spin is 
adequate, although we will aim for two.