"error-type" element needed in grammar

[Matthieu Caneill]

On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 7:18 PM, David Malcolm <dmalcolm at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 17:56 +0200, Matthieu Caneill wrote:
>> I use the Coccinelle [1] static analyzer (which I've instrumented to
>> support Firehose output), and it can process different kind of
>> (possibly user-defined) tests. It could be useful to add a variable in
>> the issue element to categorize more precisely the type of error; and
>> any other tool which supports different kind of tests would benefit
>> from such an extension. Such an element could be called "error-type"
>> or "check-name". What do you think about this? I can submit a pull
>> request if you agree with this.
>
> Isn't this just the test-id attribute of <issue> ?

I didn't see this like an error type, but after re-reading its
description it seems that it's the corresponding item. Thanks!

--
Matthieu