Update on forcing autohinting per font

pravin.d.s at gmail.com pravin.d.s at gmail.com
Tue Jun 7 07:08:29 UTC 2011


On 6 June 2011 21:25, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad at behdad.org> wrote:

> On 06/06/11 11:03, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > So please do not sabotage efforts to get a real-world bug fixed in a
> timely
> > manner in the name of some theoretical ideal fix which will take months
> or
> > years to develop.
>
>
> Kevin, apparently you do not quite understand how fontconfig is supposed to
> be
> used.  That's fine.  Qt is broken, been broken for years.  I'm not talking
> about "theoretical ideal fix".  It's plain wrong, a patch to fix it would
> be
> prolly 20 lines.  Now if no one really cares about fixing it properly, why
> bother?  Has the issue even been reported to Qt upstream?
>

I do agree with Behdad, problem must be fix from where it originates.
.conf rules must be process same way whether it is pango or qt.

for getting some breathing time i am presently fixing it in fonts with
tweak.

Thanks,
Pravin S
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fonts/attachments/20110607/c6780f29/attachment.html 


More information about the fonts mailing list