Events FAD remote participation infrastructure

[Mel Chua]

On 01/11/2010 05:36 PM, Clint Savage wrote:
>> Yep, we should be continuously in #fudcon-planning - I think of IRC as
>> our default/fallback communication medium, in case the call drops out,
>> gobby doesn't work, etc. I think designating someone in the room at any
>> given point in time to serve as "The IRC Bridge" may be a good idea, so
>> remote folks know who they can ping to catch someone's attention.
>
> Shouldn't we be using #fad?  I mean it is a FAD afterall :)

We could do that too. :) I'm honestly happy with 
#$any_prearranged_and_publicized_channel.

--Mel