[fudcon-planning] #374: FUDCon EMEA - several bills

[fudcon-planning]

#374: FUDCon EMEA - several bills
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  shaiton      |       Owner:  rbergero
     Type:  Funding      |      Status:  new
  request                |   Milestone:  Paris 2012: Travel Subsidies
 Priority:  normal       |  Requested
Component:  FUDCon       |  Resolution:
  Paris 2012             |  Blocked By:
 Keywords:               |
 Blocking:               |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Comment (by shaiton):

 Replying to [comment:6 rbergero]:
 > Guys,
 >
 > I'd really be more comfortable with reimbursing people individually via
 paypal or even via wire transfer (despite the difficulties of wire
 transfer).  The NPO didn't make the purchases, the individuals did,
 reimbursing a different individual/organization not only looks odd to
 finance - but there is also no way for me to guarantee that the
 individuals who are owed money by Red Hat are getting paid back.
 >
 > This isn't a "trust" thing - it's simply a matter of being consistent in
 how we reimburse people.
 >

 I can understand that but:
 - This has been already made before (ok, this is not a reason to make it
 happen again)
 - We can give you a personal PayPal account (not the NPO one but the
 eseyman for example), and this will be exactly the same. From what I see,
 you need to reimburse who paid, exactly. Look at the bills, they are
 labeled to the NPO. Ok, not necessarily all of them.

 Even if we paid by ourselves, several invoices were made for the NPO. If
 we separate this to an other ticket, would that work? From what you
 explained, I don't see any issue here.

 For the other tickets bills, separating to an other ticket would work.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fudcon-planning/ticket/374#comment:9>
fudcon-planning <http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon>
FUDCon event planning