CC'ing bugzilla requests and owners.list to this list

[Hugo Cisneiros]

On Thursday 06 July 2006 16:40, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Michael Thomas wrote:
> > Hugo Cisneiros wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Since we are (IMO) a integrated group, I had an idea to better
> >> communicate our packaging proccess. What if we add the
> >> fedora-games-list at redhat.com to the CC on our bugzilla review requests
> >> and the owners.list (as co-maintainer)?
> >>
> >> With this we can "ask automatically" if someone here can review the
> >> package, or help.
> >>
> >> I think perl extras sig works in this way too... But can this be the
> >> focus on this list? (I think yes). Then, before doing, let's get some
> >> opinions :-)
> >
> > +1 to adding f-g-l to the cc list on reviews.
>
> +1 too

+1 here :-)

> Question, thus this complete or replace the tracker on the SIGs wiki, I
> vote for complete. Since I tend to delete mail and if I feel like doing
> a review the tracker on the wiki is a good place to start

I think it completes as well. The mail is only a good notification system that 
you can always ignore if you want ;) The wiki can be a complete and always 
present list.

The question is, can bugzilla send emails to here? bugzilla at redhat.com is 
allowed to post here?

> > -1 to adding f-g-l to the cc field for owners.list, at least until we
> > see how much traffic the bugzilla mail generates.
>
> -1 too, although I might be interested in some game packages bugs (like
> libs packages of mine use) I'm not interested in all game packages bugs
> and I get way too much mail as is already.

I agree with these opinions.

-- 
[]'s
Eitch

http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/
"Talk is cheap. Show me the code." - Linus Torvalds