Armagetron: clarification

[Jon Ciesla]

>
> On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 06:28 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 10:00 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> After a bit of funging, I've got a spec and a few patches which
>> conform
>> >>> to
>> >>> the above.  I contacted upstream about the name, and got no
>> response.
>> >>> The
>> >>> name I'm currently working under is WeaselCycles.
>> >>>
>> >>> Anyone want to see it, and/or offer suggestions before I submit it
>> for
>> >>> review?
>> >>
>> >> The code change looks ok on a first pass, you need to do the docs as
>> >> well.
>> >
>> > If you look at the html docs included in the RPM, you'll see that they
>> are
>> > affected by the change in the configure file.
>> >
>> >> Also, the spec file from upstream makes me cry. Please rewrite it. :)
>> >
>> > I know, I could hear the kittens screaming when I read it.  I intend
>> to,
>> > once the name is sorted out. :)
>>
>> When I mentioned that I'd altered the logo, there were eager suggestions
>> from upstream to provide us with a version of the logo reflecting the
>> name
>> change.  Is it ok to include the project's URL,
>> http://www.armagetronad.net, in the logo?  It's not a deal-breaker if
>> it's
>> not.
>
> I'm going to say its OK, as we're not calling the software the URL.

I've got approval for the new name, Armacycles Advanced, and they've
provided a new logo.  I've also cleaned up the spec.  Any reason not to
submit for review?

> ~spot
>


-- 
novus ordo absurdum