[Fedora-haskell-list] [Bug 550105] Review Request: ghc-parsec - Haskell parser library
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jan 10 17:44:30 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550105
Rakesh Pandit <rpandit at redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpandit at redhat.com
Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit <rpandit at redhat.com> 2010-01-10 12:44:27 EST ---
[x] Build - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1912376 fine
[x] rpmlint - ok
ghc-parsec.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
ghc-parsec.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
[rakesh at dhcp1-96 SPECS]$ rpmlint
/home/rakesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-parsec-2.1.0.1-2.fc13.i686.rpm
ghc-parsec.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/parsec-2.1.0.1/libHSparsec-2.1.0.1-ghc6.12.1.so
ghc-parsec.i686: W: executable-stack
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/parsec-2.1.0.1/libHSparsec-2.1.0.1-ghc6.12.1.so
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Ignore
[rakesh at dhcp1-96 SPECS]$ rpmlint
/home/rakesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-parsec-devel-2.1.0.1-2.fc13.i686.rpm
ghc-parsec-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Ignore
[rakesh at dhcp1-96 SPECS]$ rpmlint
/home/rakesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-parsec-doc-2.1.0.1-2.fc13.i686.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
fine
[rakesh at dhcp1-96 SPECS]$ rpmlint
/home/rakesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-parsec-prof-2.1.0.1-2.fc13.i686.rpm
ghc-parsec-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-parsec-devel
ghc-parsec-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
ghc-parsec-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/parsec-2.1.0.1/libHSparsec-2.1.0.1_p.a
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
Ignore
[x] name fine
[x] URL fine
[-] source ok
from srpm f09c7fcbf66c39cc4de2a50dbb1374ba82168b52 (sha1sum)
still to check from http://hackage.haskell.org/ as it went down
[x] spec name fine
[x] license ok (copy present) and source has marking
[x] source tree ok (no binaries present)
[x] archs - fine
[x] spec file legible and in american english
[x] BR's ok
[x] %files ok
[x] folders owned - ok
/usr/share/doc/ghc-mtl-1.1.0.2
/usr/lib/ghc-6.12.1/mtl-1.1.0.2
[x] source builds fine on fedora ghc archs
[x] no bundled dependencies
[x] %clean section ok
[x] filenames - ok (valid)
[x] profiling ok
[x] lib goes to %{_libdir}/ghc-%{ghc_version}/%{pkg_name}-%{version}
[x] new macros
APPROVED
You may ask for cvs request. I have done manual source traversal and it is
safe. Will verify whether it is actually from upstream in a while when site is
up.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the haskell-devel
mailing list