[Bug 962251] Review Request: ghc-libxml-sax - Haskell bindings for the libxml2 SAX interface

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962251

Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |petersen at redhat.com

--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Dan Callaghan from comment #3)
> Well, I cleaned out some comments/whitespace because I figured I would be
> maintaining the spec by hand, since cabal-rpm got the description, summary,
> and BuildRequires wrong. Is there a better way?

I assume you mean "xml2-devel"?  Yeah I am planning to improve that.
Eventually I would also like cabal-rpm to support updating of packages
but that is a bit more complicated.

For now you can use cabal-rpm-diff (cblrpm-diff) to compare your
spec file to what cblrpm would generate.  So yeah it is a manual
process - I usually use a merge tool to merge changes from .spec.cblrpm
to .spec.  But removing the comments just adds to the diff. :)
We generally try to stay close to the cblrpm output.

Suggestions for improving the Summary and Description output
are welcome - in this case not sure how cblrpm could do better. :)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mkVUFk4Z7J&a=cc_unsubscribe