#37: Should we need i18n-sig fas group?

[Fedora Internationalization]

#37: Should we need i18n-sig fas group?
--------------------+---------------------
Reporter:  pnemade  |       Owner:  i18n@…
    Type:  meeting  |      Status:  closed
Priority:  major    |  Resolution:  fixed
Keywords:           |  Blocked By:
Blocking:           |
--------------------+---------------------
Changes (by pnemade):

 * resolution:   => fixed
 * status:  assigned => closed


Comment:

 Discussed this with Pierre-YvesChibon and concluded we don't need i18n-sig
 FAS group. Below is summary of the discussion

 1) i18n-team is a pseudo-user and it is working fine in pkgdb2.

 2) we can track packages for i18n-team as
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/i18n-team/

 3) Benefits that FAS user group can provide are
   a) Share ACL's on packages
   b) Setup private mailing list. The idea of the private lists is that in
 case of group the mailing list has the bugzilla account and you'll want to
 account for potential security bug

 4) Concluded that we are less interested in group setup.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/i18n/ticket/37#comment:5>
Fedora Internationalization <http://fedorahosted.org/i18n/>
Fedora i18n Project