<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 27 August 2013 00:57, Bill Nottingham <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:notting@redhat.com" target="_blank">notting@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="im"><a href="mailto:pravin.d.s@gmail.com">pravin.d.s@gmail.com</a> (<a href="mailto:pravin.d.s@gmail.com">pravin.d.s@gmail.com</a>) said:<br>
> > Recently i done packaging of google-noto-fonts [1] for Fedora. With this<br>
> > font we got number of new script fonts of Unicode which were not available<br>
> > earlier. [2]<br>
> ><br>
> > Just done editing of comps file and my question is out of these script<br>
> > fonts how many we suppose to install by default.<br>
> ><br>
> > Presently we are following like at least one fonts for each script<br>
> > should be available with default installation, so if anyone while browsing<br>
> > web etc can get correct rendering for his script.<br>
> ><br>
> > But here issue is supporting whole Unicode with default installation<br>
> > will be too much.<br>
> ><br>
> > Might be we should only install fonts for BMP of Unicode and lets have<br>
> > other fonts installed by users when required (we do have feature in Fedora<br>
> > where if any fonts are not installed by default fontconfig search for<br>
> > particular script fonts.)<br>
> ><br>
> > I have done comps editing by keeping above thing in mind. If anyone have<br>
> > other suggestion please let me know.<br>
<br>
</div>Sticking to the BMP is probably a good starting point, although I can see<br>
desktop installations wanting the emoji subset of the SMP installed out of<br>
the box.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yeah.<br>If someone does specific request for SMP we should go ahead with it. At the end of days it is going to take only some kb's space in ISO's. <br><br></div><div>
Regards,<br>Pravin Satpute<br></div></div></div></div>