<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 16 October 2014 13:38, Richard Hughes <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hughsient@gmail.com" target="_blank">hughsient@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 16 October 2014 08:07, <a href="mailto:pravin.d.s@gmail.com">pravin.d.s@gmail.com</a> <<a href="mailto:pravin.d.s@gmail.com">pravin.d.s@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> While going through metadata, i found situation is bit familiar with<br>
> fontconfig (.conf) files in font packages. As per font packaging guideline<br>
> fontconfig file is mandatory for each font packages.<br>
<br>
</span>Kinda. I think fontconfig files are a very good idea to be mandatory,<br>
so they actually work when installed. We *don't* want all fonts to<br>
have MetaInfo files however; some fonts are poor quality or only<br>
contain some glyphs (e.g. the Ubuntu title font) and we don't want to<br>
show those.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Does this means only a subset of packages will be accessible via gnome-software and for other users need to do dnf search/install?<br><br></div><div>User will not see particular font unless until he search. I think good to allow all and let user decide which is good quality and which is not. <br></div><div><br></div><div>Regards,<br></div><div>Pravin Satpute<br></div></div></div></div>