Change Request: git-1.7.2.1-2

Jesse Keating jkeating at redhat.com
Fri Aug 6 18:55:05 UTC 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/03/2010 07:49 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> I'd like to use this build:
> 
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2376842
> 
> on pkgs01 via the infrastructure repo to fix this problem:
> 
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/620805
> 
> Can I get 2+1's (to sign it, add it to the repo and update it on pkgs01).
> It should be easy to revert if something goes wrong though I talked with
> tmz (a git maintainer) and he said it should be a pretty safe upgrade.
> 
> 

While I'm not opposed to this upgrade, I wonder if I missed something.
When I became aware of this bug, it only seemed to effect client side
installs, that is users who had the bad build could not clone from
pkgs01.  But users who had a good build could, without any change to the
infrastructure on pkgs01.  Is there a use case failure I'm missing?

- -- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkxcWokACgkQ4v2HLvE71NXPQACgj5nPmdEktpfwvolI07RAMrAo
z1MAoI8odu9qH6tK1QVO7Wz/xL4fEZIG
=A+y9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the infrastructure mailing list