GSoC idea to setup Gitlab for Fedora Hosted, looking for mentors

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Tue Apr 3 16:43:42 UTC 2012


On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 07:23:51 +0200
Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com> wrote:

> Dne 20.3.2012 15:58, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:26:29 +0530
> > ranjib dey<dey.ranjib at gmail.com>  wrote:
> >
> >> yes indeed, rubio from frameos has already done it (ruby19) and the
> >> lot of us (from chef, and RoR community atleast) have tested it
> >> out. Any chance we can reuse those specs in?
> > As long as they pass Fedora guidelines, are free, and pass review,
> > sure. ;)
> >
> > kevin
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > infrastructure mailing list
> > infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
> 
> F17 and above has already Ruby 1.9.3

Sure, but we don't typically run Fedora instances in Fedora
Infrastructure. The update churn and short lifespan make it not very
viable in many cases. 

Also, puppet is broken in f17/f18 currently, making it extra difficult
to manage/deploy. 

kevin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20120403/b66b2e92/attachment.sig>


More information about the infrastructure mailing list