Security
cyberworm
cyberworm54 at dc317.org
Wed Jun 13 22:30:59 UTC 2012
I am an OSCE OSCP OSWP I can help with some security :)
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 02:09 +0000,
infrastructure-request at lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> Send infrastructure mailing list submissions to
> infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> infrastructure-request at lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> infrastructure-owner at lists.fedoraproject.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of infrastructure digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Ticket #1084 Research/Updates (Kevin Fenzi)
> 2. mulling the idea of a Infrastructure Security FAD (fedora
> activity day) (Kevin Fenzi)
> 3. Re: mulling the idea of a Infrastructure Security FAD (fedora
> activity day) (Jayson Rowe)
> 4. Re: mulling the idea of a Infrastructure Security FAD (fedora
> activity day) (Ricky Elrod)
> 5. Re: mulling the idea of a Infrastructure Security FAD (fedora
> activity day) (Stephen John Smoogen)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:56:21 -0600
> From: Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com>
> To: infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Ticket #1084 Research/Updates
> Message-ID: <20120612135621.681a7a0d at jelerak.scrye.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:40:08 -0400
> Jason Taylor <fedrhino42 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > After talking with nirik briefly about this ticket, poking around and
> > getting oriented a little it seems like starting with a high level
> > view working to a more detailed low level view is the way to go
> > updating/creating these docs. With that in mind the first item I am
> > looking at is:
> >
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:Infrastructure_Architecture_GlobalNetwork.png
> >
> > A few questions:
> > 1. How attached are we to this specific image? Can I look around for a
> > different image to put this information on?
>
> Not very. I'm happy with any image/setup that conveys how things are,
> with extra bonus for easy to add new things or change.
>
> > 2. With regard to the data on the image, do we still utilize both
> > ServerBeach locations? (I didn't run across any location
> > specifications regarding which serverbeach location in nagios or
> > puppet)
>
> Nope. All our serverbeach machines are in the same datacenter now.
>
> It's their San Antonio, TX datacenter.
>
> > 3. Are there any other locations that should be added? (e.g.
> > Internetx)
>
> Yeah, internetx is also in Germany. Berlin I think.
>
> osuosl is in Corvallis, oregon, us.
>
> bodhost is in england (not sure exactly where).
>
> kevin
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 836 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20120612/2f6ff8aa/attachment-0001.sig>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:03:48 -0600
> From: Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com>
> To: Fedora Infrastructure <infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Subject: mulling the idea of a Infrastructure Security FAD (fedora
> activity day)
> Message-ID: <20120612170348.16cec5a0 at jelerak.scrye.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Greetings.
>
> I've been toying with the idea of a Fedora Infrastructure FAD (Fedora
> Activity Day) around getting our security tasks further along/mapped
> out, or just done. We can do all these things remotely, but sitting
> down with less distractions and getting things done or deciding on
> roadmaps may work faster/better in person.
>
> More information on FAD's:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Activity_Day_-_FAD
>
> Some possible Goals:
>
> * Put in place our 2 factor authentication solution.
> - Enable globally for sudo.
> - Come up with plan/roadmap for applications 2 factor
> authentication.
> - enable more 2nd factors if we only have one working.
> (yubikey, google authenticator, others?)
> * Revamp firewall rules to further restrict traffic between machines.
> * Come up with a better plan for signing servers
> - In puppet or out of puppet?
> - On demand vs always on
> - ssh access, console, 2factor?
> * Hash out a roadmap or plans around git commit signing.
> - See if this is something we want to do
> * Work on FAS security enhancements
> - backup email address?
> - security questions?
> - better gpg integration?
> - handling for 2 factor auth
> * Setup a simple IDS of some kind?
> - Notice non standard traffic in our internal nets
> * Finish up keys.fedoraproject.org and announce it.
> * Clean up selinux AVCs and move more things to enforcing.
> * Your brilliant Fedora Infrastructure security related idea here.
>
> Possible dates:
>
> last week of Aug, First week of Sept?
> (This puts us between the Alpha and Beta freezes, and is possibly
> enough notice to get better airfair/etc rates).
> somewhere in 2012-08-27 to 2012-09-10
>
> First 2 weeks in Nov?
> (After F18 is released, before thanksgiving)
> somewhere in 2012-11-05 to 2012-11-16
>
> Right before next Fudcon?
> 2013-01-15 to 2013-01-17?
>
> Your exciting better dates here.
>
> Possible locations:
>
> Red Hat HQ in RDU?
> pros: can probably get a room/network and pull in other RH folks
>
> Westford, MA
> pros: could probably get a room/network and pull in other RH
> engr folks.
>
> Other location here:
> must be cheap to fly to/stay at, and have a facility we could
> meet at and use.
>
> So, this is more a 'is there enough interest in this to peruse it' type
> of email.
>
> How many folks would be interested in going to something like this?
>
> What dates or places would you prefer?
>
> Is there another topic that would be a better thing to do than
> Security? I can think of several more topics if we would prefer
> something else (Fixing our application logging could be it's own FAD by
> itself).
>
> Thoughts?
>
> kevin
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 836 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20120612/4ab3bc81/attachment-0001.sig>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 20:55:00 -0400
> From: Jayson Rowe <jayson.rowe at gmail.com>
> To: Fedora Infrastructure <infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Subject: Re: mulling the idea of a Infrastructure Security FAD (fedora
> activity day)
> Message-ID:
> <CAKNS325+dPj-Kp3j0nkQHCFMN2=kXNiNSgv9dZj1cJXK73mp4w at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > I've been toying with the idea of a Fedora Infrastructure FAD (Fedora
> > Activity Day) around getting our security tasks further along/mapped
> > out, or just done. We can do all these things remotely, but sitting
> > down with less distractions and getting things done or deciding on
> > roadmaps may work faster/better in person.
> >
> > More information on FAD's:
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Activity_Day_-_FAD
> >
> > Some possible Goals:
> >
> > * Put in place our 2 factor authentication solution.
> > - Enable globally for sudo.
> > - Come up with plan/roadmap for applications 2 factor
> > authentication.
> > - enable more 2nd factors if we only have one working.
> > (yubikey, google authenticator, others?)
> > * Revamp firewall rules to further restrict traffic between machines.
> > * Come up with a better plan for signing servers
> > - In puppet or out of puppet?
> > - On demand vs always on
> > - ssh access, console, 2factor?
> > * Hash out a roadmap or plans around git commit signing.
> > - See if this is something we want to do
> > * Work on FAS security enhancements
> > - backup email address?
> > - security questions?
> > - better gpg integration?
> > - handling for 2 factor auth
> > * Setup a simple IDS of some kind?
> > - Notice non standard traffic in our internal nets
> > * Finish up keys.fedoraproject.org and announce it.
> > * Clean up selinux AVCs and move more things to enforcing.
> > * Your brilliant Fedora Infrastructure security related idea here.
> >
> > Possible dates:
> >
> > last week of Aug, First week of Sept?
> > (This puts us between the Alpha and Beta freezes, and is possibly
> > enough notice to get better airfair/etc rates).
> > somewhere in 2012-08-27 to 2012-09-10
> >
> > First 2 weeks in Nov?
> > (After F18 is released, before thanksgiving)
> > somewhere in 2012-11-05 to 2012-11-16
> >
> > Right before next Fudcon?
> > 2013-01-15 to 2013-01-17?
> >
> > Your exciting better dates here.
> >
> > Possible locations:
> >
> > Red Hat HQ in RDU?
> > pros: can probably get a room/network and pull in other RH folks
> >
> > Westford, MA
> > pros: could probably get a room/network and pull in other RH
> > engr folks.
> >
> > Other location here:
> > must be cheap to fly to/stay at, and have a facility we could
> > meet at and use.
> >
> > So, this is more a 'is there enough interest in this to peruse it' type
> > of email.
> >
> > How many folks would be interested in going to something like this?
> >
> > What dates or places would you prefer?
> >
> > Is there another topic that would be a better thing to do than
> > Security? I can think of several more topics if we would prefer
> > something else (Fixing our application logging could be it's own FAD by
> > itself).
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > kevin
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > infrastructure mailing list
> > infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>
> I would absolutely love to come to something like this. Due to
> finances, and not having to buy a plane ticket, RDU would be best for
> me (I could drive...I'm about a 3.5hr drive away), and I'm almost sure
> I could swing it, especially if I could split a room w/ someone. Dates
> aren't as big of a deal for me. How many days of the week would it
> involve? I'd have to make sure I have extra vacation time at work to
> spare.
>
> --
> -jayson
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 20:55:10 -0400
> From: Ricky Elrod <codeblock at elrod.me>
> To: infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: mulling the idea of a Infrastructure Security FAD (fedora
> activity day)
> Message-ID: <4FD7E4EE.3050903 at elrod.me>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> So, I really like this idea. I think it would be a really fun and
> productive time.
>
> I think security is a good topic, but it'll be good to see if anyone
> else has other ideas. I think we have quite a few things we could cover
> in the security realm though, like you listed.
>
> I'd prefer to stay away from the last week of August/first week of
> September, because for me (and possibly others -- Ian?) classes will
> just have started back up. I'd vote for earlier, maybe the end of July?
> Or the first week or two of August? Beyond that us college-goers will
> probably be getting ready for the semester.
>
> I don't have a lot of preference on location, either of your ideas are
> about the same distance from me, personally.
>
> But yes, I'm very interested in this, I think it would be a lot of fun,
> and I think we could get a lot done.
>
> -re
>
> On 06/12/2012 07:03 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > I've been toying with the idea of a Fedora Infrastructure FAD (Fedora
> > Activity Day) around getting our security tasks further along/mapped
> > out, or just done. We can do all these things remotely, but sitting
> > down with less distractions and getting things done or deciding on
> > roadmaps may work faster/better in person.
> >
> > More information on FAD's:
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Activity_Day_-_FAD
> >
> > Some possible Goals:
> >
> > * Put in place our 2 factor authentication solution.
> > - Enable globally for sudo.
> > - Come up with plan/roadmap for applications 2 factor
> > authentication.
> > - enable more 2nd factors if we only have one working.
> > (yubikey, google authenticator, others?)
> > * Revamp firewall rules to further restrict traffic between machines.
> > * Come up with a better plan for signing servers
> > - In puppet or out of puppet?
> > - On demand vs always on
> > - ssh access, console, 2factor?
> > * Hash out a roadmap or plans around git commit signing.
> > - See if this is something we want to do
> > * Work on FAS security enhancements
> > - backup email address?
> > - security questions?
> > - better gpg integration?
> > - handling for 2 factor auth
> > * Setup a simple IDS of some kind?
> > - Notice non standard traffic in our internal nets
> > * Finish up keys.fedoraproject.org and announce it.
> > * Clean up selinux AVCs and move more things to enforcing.
> > * Your brilliant Fedora Infrastructure security related idea here.
> >
> > Possible dates:
> >
> > last week of Aug, First week of Sept?
> > (This puts us between the Alpha and Beta freezes, and is possibly
> > enough notice to get better airfair/etc rates).
> > somewhere in 2012-08-27 to 2012-09-10
> >
> > First 2 weeks in Nov?
> > (After F18 is released, before thanksgiving)
> > somewhere in 2012-11-05 to 2012-11-16
> >
> > Right before next Fudcon?
> > 2013-01-15 to 2013-01-17?
> >
> > Your exciting better dates here.
> >
> > Possible locations:
> >
> > Red Hat HQ in RDU?
> > pros: can probably get a room/network and pull in other RH folks
> >
> > Westford, MA
> > pros: could probably get a room/network and pull in other RH
> > engr folks.
> >
> > Other location here:
> > must be cheap to fly to/stay at, and have a facility we could
> > meet at and use.
> >
> > So, this is more a 'is there enough interest in this to peruse it' type
> > of email.
> >
> > How many folks would be interested in going to something like this?
> >
> > What dates or places would you prefer?
> >
> > Is there another topic that would be a better thing to do than
> > Security? I can think of several more topics if we would prefer
> > something else (Fixing our application logging could be it's own FAD by
> > itself).
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > kevin
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > infrastructure mailing list
> > infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
> >
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 490 bytes
> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/attachments/20120612/9842323f/attachment-0001.sig>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 20:09:26 -0600
> From: Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com>
> To: Fedora Infrastructure <infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Subject: Re: mulling the idea of a Infrastructure Security FAD (fedora
> activity day)
> Message-ID:
> <CANnLRdisY0Wpv+mcX2Ob5s87BfMja4WnUqWUQTEQkynyeJWTkg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
> On 12 June 2012 17:03, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > I've been toying with the idea of a Fedora Infrastructure FAD (Fedora
> > Activity Day) around getting our security tasks further along/mapped
> > out, or just done. We can do all these things remotely, but sitting
> > down with less distractions and getting things done or deciding on
> > roadmaps may work faster/better in person.
> >
> > More information on FAD's:
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Activity_Day_-_FAD
> >
> > Some possible Goals:
> >
> > * Put in place our 2 factor authentication solution.
> > - Enable globally for sudo.
> > - Come up with plan/roadmap for applications 2 factor
> > authentication.
> > - enable more 2nd factors if we only have one working.
> > (yubikey, google authenticator, others?)
>
> I think this would be a good focus. We are looking at a 2 day
> work-fest (meaning many people would be block out 4 days (2 to travel,
> 2 to work)) and I think that would take up most of that 2 days. The
> next primary focus would be mapping what we have and how they talk to
> each other. Getting to know what is around and how it talks to
> everything is a time consuming task but once it is done, it makes
> figuring out what is left out in the wind, what we care about and what
> we don't much easier.
>
> > * Revamp firewall rules to further restrict traffic between machines.
> > * Come up with a better plan for signing servers
> > - In puppet or out of puppet?
> > - On demand vs always on
> > - ssh access, console, 2factor?
> > * Hash out a roadmap or plans around git commit signing.
> > - See if this is something we want to do
> > * Work on FAS security enhancements
> > - backup email address?
> > - security questions?
> > - better gpg integration?
> > - handling for 2 factor auth
> > * Setup a simple IDS of some kind?
> > - Notice non standard traffic in our internal nets
> > * Finish up keys.fedoraproject.org and announce it.
> > * Clean up selinux AVCs and move more things to enforcing.
> > * Your brilliant Fedora Infrastructure security related idea here.
> >
> > Possible dates:
> >
> > last week of Aug, First week of Sept?
> > (This puts us between the Alpha and Beta freezes, and is possibly
> > enough notice to get better airfair/etc rates).
> > somewhere in 2012-08-27 to 2012-09-10
> >
> > First 2 weeks in Nov?
> > (After F18 is released, before thanksgiving)
> > somewhere in 2012-11-05 to 2012-11-16
> >
> > Right before next Fudcon?
> > 2013-01-15 to 2013-01-17?
> >
> > Your exciting better dates here.
> >
> > Possible locations:
> >
> > Red Hat HQ in RDU?
> > pros: can probably get a room/network and pull in other RH folks
> >
> > Westford, MA
> > pros: could probably get a room/network and pull in other RH
> > engr folks.
> >
> > Other location here:
> > must be cheap to fly to/stay at, and have a facility we could
> > meet at and use.
> >
> > So, this is more a 'is there enough interest in this to peruse it' type
> > of email.
> >
> > How many folks would be interested in going to something like this?
> >
> > What dates or places would you prefer?
> >
> > Is there another topic that would be a better thing to do than
> > Security? I can think of several more topics if we would prefer
> > something else (Fixing our application logging could be it's own FAD by
> > itself).
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > kevin
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > infrastructure mailing list
> > infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
>
>
>
More information about the infrastructure
mailing list