<p dir="ltr"><br>
On Jan 21, 2014 2:42 PM, "Luke Macken" <<a href="mailto:lmacken@redhat.com">lmacken@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 03:11:17PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:<br>
> > So, what I would like to ask is:<br>
> > * what do you think of the project? Worth pursuing or not?<br>
><br>
> Love it. Totally worth pursuing :)<br>
><br>
> > * Where should it live?<br>
><br>
> I'm all for keeping it distro-agnostic, but having a Powered by OpenShift<br>
> button on there couldn't hurt :P</p>
<p dir="ltr">+11</p>
<p dir="ltr">-AdamM</p>
<p dir="ltr">><br>
> > * Domain name suggestions? (<a href="http://release-monitoring.org">release-monitoring.org</a>, <a href="http://cnucnu.org">cnucnu.org</a>, <a href="http://cnucnuweb.org">cnucnuweb.org</a>,<br>
> > <insert here you own idea>?)<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://release-monitoring.org">release-monitoring.org</a> is decent, anything with the name cnucnu in it<br>
> will be confusing, but part of me thinks it should contain the word<br>
> upstream.<br>
><br>
> Do you envision any sort of API for this? We've wanted to have an 'Upstream<br>
> Summary' section in the fedora-packages app for a while now.<br>
> <a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Packager#Package_details_.3E_overview">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Packager#Package_details_.3E_overview</a><br>
> So having an API that we could hit to get the SCM type/url and latest version<br>
> would be nice :)<br>
><br>
> It also feels like cnucnu is the Right Place to house DOAP metadata ;)<br>
><br>
> luke<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> infrastructure mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org">infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure</a></p>