<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA1<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 01/21/2012 05:04 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:<br>
<span style="white-space: pre;">> On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 00:08:04
+0000<br>
> Dave Riches <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:david.r@ultracar.co.uk"><david.r@ultracar.co.uk></a> wrote:<br>
><br>
>> On 01/21/2012 07:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:<br>
>>> ok, here's my proposal, feel free to pick it apart,
or use it as the<br>
>>> basis for your own different proposal. ;)<br>
>>><br>
>>> a) The sig controls/manages the following channels:<br>
>>><br>
>>> #fedora<br>
>>> #fedora-social<br>
>>> #fedora-unregistered<br>
>>> #fedora-ops<br>
>> +1<br>
>>><br>
>>> b) Voting members are everyone who's an op in any
of the managed<br>
>>> channels.<br>
>> Without trying to be pedantic....this does slightly
trigger the issue<br>
>> of how does an op expire? I am +o on some of those
channels right<br>
>> now...if I disappear for a few years and return....does
my status as<br>
>> op, and indeed voting rights remain? If not, how do we
handle this<br>
>> (perhaps the expiration of op/definition of active op
should be the<br>
>> subject of a different thread?)<br>
><br>
> It's handed via the removal section below. If someone
decides you<br>
> haven't been around for a while and should be removed, they
can propose<br>
> it. :) <br>
></span><br>
why should anyone need to propose it?<br>
<br>
it's a simple equation, if you're inactive for
$predefined_time_period<br>
you're removed. simple.<br>
if you want to keep your ops, you stay active and involved,
period.<br>
<br>
you had a baby? great news.<br>
you went on a safari for 6 months? fantastic.<br>
you've been training for an everest summit? bravo. sir edmund
hillary!<br>
<br>
but none of those things has to do with fedora or irc.<br>
<br>
if you're not active, why should you be voting on anything you've
not<br>
seen it important enough to stay actively involved with?<br>
<br>
keep the old boys club alive, ops never expire!<br>
<span style="white-space: pre;">>> I'm cool with this,
provided that once we (the sig) have assumed<br>
>> control of the channel wrt operators...the sig is then
responsible<br>
>> for appointing/removing operators as per the procedure
indicated<br>
>> above. Making the assumption that this is correct, +1<br>
><br>
> Yep. That was the idea. <br>
><br>
> kevin<br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> irc-support-sig mailing list<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:irc-support-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org">irc-support-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org</a><br>
>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/irc-support-sig">https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/irc-support-sig</a></span><br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)<br>
<br>
iEYEARECAAYFAk8bdWMACgkQI5ZhoGXYrD4P6ACeJbFpDOfrrCrM7B12cPymsMzd<br>
Bk0AoI0ELZ/dHuRax5o5tz3/Hf9ViQY1<br>
=K1bw<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>