akurtako at redhat.com
Tue Feb 17 12:54:15 UTC 2009
Mat Booth wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Seeing the page made me think that the Fedora Eclipse comps group 
>>> is terribly outdated. Should we be adding our plugins to this group?
>> Yeah, we should update it. Let's discuss potential patches here.
> We should at least include all the IDE plugins in the "Fedora Eclipse"
> group as optionals to make them 'discoverable,' as it were:
I don't like the idea of putting birt and dtp until they are fully
builded. These packages contain only a small part of birt and dtp (as
needed by valgrind) and until they are fully functional , including them
will cause only confusion in users - I installed eclipse-birt but birt
is not available. Let them be pulled by dependencies only when needed.
If we decide to add eclipse-valgrind (soon to enter rawhide) to the list
this wouldn't matter because it requires them.
To the previous I would add:
More information about the java-devel