soprano-backend-sesame2

[John5342]

2009/3/5 Patrick O'Callaghan <pocallaghan at gmail.com>

> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 17:37 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 07:44 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > >> Based on the work of a fellow contributor, I've massaged and built a
> > >> soprano-backend-sesame2 package for testing purposes, and stuffed into
> > >> kde-redhat/unstable F-10 repo.
> > >> soprano-backend-sesame2
> > >>
> > >> As I said, it's for testing purposes only, and includes binary .jars,
> > >> which aren't built from source... so it's not acceptable yet for
> > >> inclusion in fedora proper.
> > >
> > > <grumble>
> > > I wish people would give even a hint of what packages are when they
> > > announce them. I monitor the Gnome-announce list as well and this kind
> > > of thing also happens there quite a lot. I'd take even money that no
> > > more than 5% of the members of this list knows what
> > > soprano-backend-sesame2 is without poking around with Google or "yum
> > > info ...". Is it so hard to write a one-line description? Good grief,
> if
> > > the thing's in an rpm it must already exist.
> > > </grumble>
> >
> > It's not ready for primetime, but for testing only at this point.
> >
> > If you don't know what it is, then you probably aren't a good candidate
> > for testing it.
>
> Sorry Rex, but that makes no sense at all. You mean only people who
> already know about this beforehand can test it?


The people who are effected by the deficiencies of the default backend will
know that sesame2 exists and have indeed asked for it. Sesame2 is however
not ready for prime time and therefore can't be recommended as a replacement
for the default at this time. The people who have asked for it are the kind
of people who would want to test it.


> No-one who doesn't
> already know could possibly be interested or have anything to add to the
> testing process? Why is it in a public repo again?


It's in a public repo because to comply with Fedora packaging guidelines all
packages have to be built from source. This package however is the upstream
binaries bundled into an rpm. I did start packaging this myself but source
code upstream does not play nice with packaging and currently other
commitments are draining all my time so unless somebody else gets there
first i will continue packaging it when i get more time. It should then go
into standard Fedora.

-- 
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary and
those who don't...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20090305/71c8f3a0/attachment.html